If you pay for Amazon Prime, you get unlimited photo storage through Amazon Photos. For most people, that reads as a straightforward perk. Upload your photos, free up your phone, done.
What the sign-up screen doesn’t say: Amazon uses those photos to develop and improve its commercial facial recognition software, Rekognition — and unlike most major cloud providers, it does not offer a meaningful opt-out.
What Is Amazon Photos, Exactly?
Amazon Photos is a cloud storage service bundled with Prime memberships. It offers unlimited original-quality photo storage (video storage is capped at 5 GB unless you pay for more). The service syncs automatically from your phone if you enable it, and it can back up your camera roll, screenshots, and downloaded images without you reviewing each one.
For many Prime subscribers, it’s simply the path of least resistance. It’s already included, the app is already installed, and storage is “unlimited.” These are compelling defaults.
The problem is that defaults favor Amazon, not you.
How Amazon Uses Your Uploaded Photos
Amazon’s Generative AI Development Disclosure states that the company may use personal information, including photos uploaded to Amazon Photos, to train and improve its machine learning models. Amazon’s Rekognition service — a commercial computer vision API sold to businesses and government agencies — has been identified in class action litigation as a direct beneficiary of this training data.
A class action lawsuit filed in Illinois federal court alleged that Amazon used facial recognition technology to scan the facial geometry of people in uploaded photos and then used that biometric data to train and improve Rekognition. The plaintiffs argued this violated Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), which requires explicit written consent before collecting facial geometry.
The lawsuit isn’t a fringe claim. Keller Rohrback, a firm specializing in complex privacy litigation, opened a formal case page for the Amazon Photos Facial Recognition Litigation. The alleged conduct — scanning faces in user-uploaded photos to improve commercial AI products — is documented in Amazon’s own disclosures.
The Opt-Out Problem
Most major cloud platforms, under pressure from privacy regulators and users, now offer some form of opt-out from AI training on personal data. Google allows you to pause AI personalization. Apple processes most photo analysis on-device. Meta offers settings (if somewhat buried) to limit AI training.
Amazon is notable for the absence of a comparable control. Its Generative AI Development Disclosure allows Amazon to use customer data for AI development without offering a clear toggle to exclude your photos from this pipeline.
The practical implication: if you have Amazon Photos sync enabled and you’ve uploaded photos of your face, your children’s faces, or anyone else who hasn’t consented, those images may have contributed to commercial facial recognition training that Amazon sells to third parties.
The “Free” Storage Trade-Off
The economics here are worth naming plainly. Unlimited photo storage costs money to run — servers, bandwidth, redundancy. When a service offers this at no additional cost and doesn’t charge for it separately, the question is always: what’s the actual trade-off?
In Amazon’s case, the answer appears to be data utility. Your photos are valuable training material for a commercial AI product that Amazon licenses to law enforcement, retailers, and other enterprises. The “free” storage is an acquisition mechanism.
This is not unique to Amazon — many free services monetize user data in some form. What’s notable here is the specific use (biometric training data for commercial sale), the absence of opt-out controls, and the gap between how the product is marketed (a convenient photo backup) and what the terms actually permit.
What the Ring Lawsuit Context Adds
Amazon’s facial recognition ambitions extend beyond Photos. In June 2026, Amazon was sued in federal court in Seattle over its Ring “Familiar Faces” feature, which applies facial recognition to Ring doorbell footage — including people who walk past a home and never agreed to anything.
These are separate products, but they share a common pattern: Amazon collecting and processing biometric data without meaningful consent, at scale, for commercial purposes. Understanding this pattern matters when evaluating whether Amazon Photos is a safe place for your personal memories.
What You Can Do Right Now
Turn off Amazon Photos backup. On Android, go to Amazon Photos app → More → Settings → Auto-Save and disable it. On iOS, the same path applies. This stops new photos from being added.
Delete your existing library. If you want to remove photos already uploaded, you’ll need to delete them manually from the Amazon Photos app or the web interface. There is no single “delete everything” button that’s easy to find. You can sort by date and select all for batch deletion, but this requires doing it in chunks.
Review what you’ve uploaded. Amazon Photos can sync screenshots, downloads, and social media images as well as camera roll photos, depending on your settings. It’s worth auditing what’s actually in your account before assuming it’s just personal photos.
Read the retention policy before deleting. Amazon states that deleted photos are removed from public view immediately but may persist in backups for 90 days. This is worth knowing before you assume immediate deletion means immediate deletion.
Check your Fire TV and Echo Photo settings. Amazon Photos content can appear as screensavers on Fire TV and Echo Show devices, which means your uploaded photos may already be displayed on more surfaces than you intended.
What “Safe” Storage Actually Looks Like
The core issue with Amazon Photos isn’t that it’s a particularly bad product — the photo quality is preserved, the backup is reliable, and the sync is seamless. The issue is that the terms of service allow Amazon to do things with your photos that most users would object to if explained clearly.
Genuinely private photo storage works differently:
- The storage provider does not use your content to train AI models, internal or third-party
- You can opt out of any data processing beyond basic storage delivery
- Deletion means deletion — not “removed from view while persisting in backups for 90 days”
- The company does not sell products built on your data
These aren’t utopian demands. They’re the baseline expectations that privacy-forward storage providers commit to in writing.
The Question Worth Asking
When you upload personal photos — your family, your home, your face across different years of your life — you’re creating a detailed biometric record. The question isn’t whether cloud storage is convenient. It is. The question is whether the provider treating your memories as training data for commercial AI is a trade-off you’ve consciously made, or one you drifted into because the app was already installed.
Most people who use Amazon Photos haven’t made that trade-off consciously. They’ve made it by default.
Knowing what the defaults are is the first step to making a different choice.
If you want a storage option that never trains AI on your content and never shows ads, daftei starts with 5 GB free.